Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
August4, 2015
In Reply Refer to:
1800B3-AffS

c)uJ

A U -'/2Oi5
'

4

FCC M

-.

aji Roo m

C)
tç.

ci ez

_1

The Community Advisory Coalition of
Ventura County
New LPFM Oxnard California
FacilityiDNo. 195126
BNPL-20131113AKO

In re:

c

E

UJi,O

FF =

Petition to Deny
*

(0
-

°c
U_c)

()

ç'f

wzZ

•-::-..
, .

S)
N

-0

'

<

,

c

T

iunity Application during the 2013 LPFM filing
d that the Community Application and the applications
("Centro"), and County of Ventura ("Ventura") were
4X Group 45•2 On July 9, 2014, the Commission
cive selectee of LPFM MX Group 45 and began a 30pplication, and 90-day periods in which the applicants
solve their mutual exclusivities.3

.

-

Sn

six board members: Byron K; Ward, Don Montgomery,
t, and John R. Hatcher III. Community answered
which asks applicants to certif' that:

/,

C
0
.co
(I,

-

E'

0
0
C,)

C Il)
0 LC)
C/)

cJ

LU

(0(J)

g3

rons Filed in the LPFM Window and Announces 60-Day
Amendments, Public Notice, 28 FCC Red 16713 (MB 2013).

2w

CO

ps of Mutually Exclusive Applications filed in the LPFM
and a 90-Day Period to File Voluntary Time-Share
ce, 29 FCC Red 8665 (2014) ("July Public Notice"). Iglesia,
in their respective applications becoming singletons.

CO
r
)
CC

.

he Community Advisory Coalition of Ventura County
ti Oxnard, California ("Community Application"); and
i Application filed by La Iglesia Cristiana de Oxnard
at the Petition as an informal objection, deny it and

U_ U

OU)
CO

a)
LI
(0
N